American management of type B dissection
Review article published in the New England Journal of Medicine, summarizing current evidence, classification, and management recommendations for type B aortic dissection.
Review article published in the New England Journal of Medicine, summarizing current evidence, classification, and management recommendations for type B aortic dissection.
Experience and comparative evaluation against the conventional procedure of a disruptive sutureless anastomotic strategy, applied both proximally and distally, for total arch replacement in patients presenting with acute type A aortic dissection.
Early results of the PRESERVERE trial with the hybrid AMDS prosthesis to improve perfusion
A multicenter North American study assessed the utility of considering a threshold lower than 5.5 cm for surgical repair of ascending aortic aneurysms.
This study evaluated the role of initiating renal replacement therapy either early or at a later stage in patients who developed acute kidney injury after surgery for type A aortic dissection, focusing on mortality and postoperative complications.
This observational study retrospectively examines the impact of posterior left pericardiotomy (PLP) on the incidence of cardiac tamponade and postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) in the setting of aortic surgery.
Summary of clinical experience and detailed description of the preoperative planning protocol and surgical technique for reoperations via median sternotomy in patients with the ascending aorta in direct contact with the posterior sternal table.
This article summarizes the step-by-step TEVAR technique for complicated type B aortic dissection as described in the original study, and includes a final commentary where we integrate practical recommendations drawn from recent surgical articles, European guidelines, and the author’s own experience.
Report on the very long-term outcomes (15 years) of a single-surgeon experience at the Cleveland Clinic with aortic root reimplantation surgery.
A meta-analysis of 11 studies confirms the superiority of the GERAADA score over EuroSCORE II for predicting 30-day surgical risk in patients with acute aortic dissection.