Robot-assisted cardiac surgery: who needs training, the surgeon or the program?
STS consensus document on recommendations for the development of robot-assisted cardiac surgery programs.
STS consensus document on recommendations for the development of robot-assisted cardiac surgery programs.
This article reviews the systematic review and meta-analysis by Trevis et al. comparing long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves in patients aged 50 to 70 years.
The expansion of transcatheter aortic valve implantation avoids open surgery, but also prevents concomitant repair of associated tricuspid regurgitation. This study assesses the consequences of leaving this second valve untreated and seeks to identify which patient profiles might benefit most from conventional combined surgery.
This study supports the emerging trend toward pericardiectomy extended to the left-sided cardiac chambers, in contrast to the traditional strategy, which by definition was limited to the low-pressure chambers and performed without CPB.
Retrospective comparative study assessing outcomes after a strategy of primary versus delayed sternal closure following the Norwood procedure.
Systematic review on cognitive decline after cardiac surgery analyzing the quality of the studies supporting this phenomenon
Single-centre retrospective observational study comparing two cardioplegic strategies in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve repair between 2014 and 2025.
Single-centre retrospective propensity score–matched study from Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, comparing double valve surgery (DVS) with isolated transcatheter aortic valve replacement (I-TAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis, with particular focus on heart failure readmissions during follow-up.
This study evaluates the AMDS Hybrid Prosthesis as an adjunct to conventional open repair in acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection with malperfusion, aiming to stabilize the aortic arch, expand the true lumen, and reduce dynamic malperfusion without routine total arch replacement.
This article provides an overview of iatrogenic aortic dissection based on an international registry, addressing its clinical features, diagnostic challenges, and different management strategies compared with spontaneous aortic dissection.